Page 138 - Conference Book The 3rd IConVET "Future of TVET Graduates: Developing Talent for Industry 4.0 and The New Normal"
P. 138

The 3  International Conference
                                                        rd
                                       on Vocational Education and Technology (IConVET)
                                 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha - Bali | 7  November, 2020
                                                              th
             COMPARISON OF THE BM25 AND RABIN KARP
              ALGORITHM FOR PLAGIARISM DETECTION

                                       1
            I Nyoman Saputra Wahyu Wijaya , Ketut Agus Seputra , Wayan Gede Suka
                                                         2
                                       Parwita 3
          1,2 Department of Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Vocational,
                              Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

            3 Teknik Informatika, STMIK STIKOM Indonesia, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

                                             1
               Email: wahyu.wijaya@undiksha.ac.id , agus.seputra@undiksha.ac.id ,
                                                                      2
                                 gede.suka@gmail.com
                                                    3
          Abstract.  Plagiarism occurs because of the easy distribution of data.
          Plagiarism detection of documents  such  as student assignments and final
          projects requires a long process, often overlooked. However, to avoid
          plagiarism, a document must be checked  for the level  of plagiarism.
          Plagiarism detection can be done online / offline with the plagiarism
          checker. However, checking documents with plagiarism checkers such as
          Turnitin, Dupli Checker, Copyleaks, PaperRater, Grammarly and others
          requires additional fees. Several studies have been  conducted to detect
          plagiarism. BM25 and Rabin Karp are examples of the Plagiarism Checker
          method. BM25 is tf idf based, while Rabin Karp is Hashing based. Each
          method needs to know its performance to detect plagiarism. Based on these
          problems, a study on the comparison of plagiarism detection with the BM25
          algorithm with Rabin-Karp will be conducted. The case study is to use the
          article in  Indonesian. The application of the BM25 and  Rabin Karp
          algorithms  goes  through the Pre-Processing  stage  which consists of case
          folding, cleaning, tokenizing, filtering, and stemming. In this study, we used
          sastrawi stemmer. The test was conducted on twenty articles in Indonesian.
          The test results that are seen are the performance in the form of execution
          time.

                                                        | IConVET 2020 | 138


                                       https://conference.undiksha.ac.id/iconvet/   | 138 |
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140